<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><lom xmlns="http://ltsc.ieee.org/xsd/LOM" xmlns:lomfr="http://www.lom-fr.fr/xsd/LOMFR" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://ltsc.ieee.org/xsd/LOM http://www.lom-fr.fr/xsd/lomfrv1.0/std/lomfr.xsd">
<general>
<identifier>
<catalog>Canal-U_Ocms</catalog>
<entry>10915</entry>
</identifier>
<title><string language="fre"><![CDATA[Cardiovascular Clinical Trialists (CVCT) Forum – Paris 2012 : Biomarker guided-therapy: Are there other endpoints besides mortality that matter? Selecting the best outcome measures]]></string></title>
<language>ENG</language>
<description>
<string language="fre"><![CDATA[Title : Cardiovascular Clinical Trialists (CVCT) Forum – Paris 2012 : Biomarker guided-therapy: Are there other endpoints besides mortality that matter? Selecting the best outcome measures
Speaker: Michael FELKER, Durham, USA
Abstract : Biomarker guided-therapy: Are there other endpoints besides mortality that matter? Selecting the best outcome measures
The measurement of biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis in heart disease has changed the fundamental way that patients are evaluated, and has led to a literal explosion of studies exploring both novel applications of established biomarkers as well as the discovery of newer biological markers. With the rise in interest in novel biomarkers has come a clear heterogeneity in the approach with which these potentially important tests have been studied, partially due to a lack of guidance as to nominal expectations for the approach for their evaluation. To this point, there is no consensus yet articulated with respect to the minimum expectations for which a new diagnostic or prognostic biomarker should be held to in order to clarify or reject their potential value. We recently proposed several standards to which novel biomarkers in heart failure should be held during their evaluation (Table) (1); these “rules” do not specifically apply to heart failure per se, and could thus theoretically serve as a starting point for determining the basic framework upon which the evaluation of novel applications of prior markers or the description of a frankly new biomarker.
1. The method by which a novel biomarker is judged (including and especially when compared to or in combination with other biomarkers) should be thorough: novel tests should be evaluated across a wide range of patients typical of the diagnosis for which it will be applied, and the statistical methods used to evaluate the biomarker (relative to clinical variables as well as other biomarkers) should be contemporary, rigorous, standardized and fair.
2. Measurement of a novel HF biomarker (e.g. in blood, urine or any easy obtainable tissue) should be easily achieved within a short period of time, provide acceptable accuracy and assays for its measurement should have defined biological variation and low analytical imprecision.
3. The biomarker should primarily reflect important (patho) physiological process(es) involved in HF presence and progression; use of biomarkers reflective of disease but originating outside the myocardium is acceptable as long as such a biomarker provides independently useful information involved in the diagnosis, prognosis, progression or therapy of HF syndromes.
4. The biomarker must provide clinically useful information for caregivers (physician, nurses, patient and others) to more swiftly and reliably establish/reject a diagnosis, to more accurately estimate prognosis, or to inform more successful therapeutic strategies. The information from such a biomarker should not recapitulate clinical information already available at the bedside, and must be additional to other biomarkers.
L’auteur n’a pas transmis de conflit d’intérêt concernant les données diffusées dans cette vidéo ou publiées dans la référence citée.
9th Global Cardiovascular Clinical Trialists Forum • Paris 2012 
WHAT IS THE OPTIMAL DESIGN FOR BIOMARKER STUDIES?
Chairpersons: Jim JANUZZI, Boston, USA - Faiez ZANNAD, Nancy, FRA
Réalisation, production : Canal U/3S et CERIMES
Keyword : Cardiovascular Clinical Trialists, Paris, 2012, Cardiovascular prevention, cardiovascular pharmacology, biomarker]]></string></description>
<keyword><string language="fre"><![CDATA[Cardiovascular Clinical Trialists, Paris, 2012, Cardiovascular prevention, cardiovascular pharmacology, biomarker]]></string></keyword>
<lomfr:documentType>
<lomfr:source>LOMFRv1.0</lomfr:source>
<lomfr:value>image en mouvement</lomfr:value>
</lomfr:documentType>
</general><lifeCycle>
<contribute>
<role>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>author</value>
</role>
<entity><![CDATA[BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:3.0
CLASS:PUBLIC
REV:2021-07-06 15:37:26
FN:Michael FELKER
N:FELKER;Michael;;;
URL;TYPE=work:https://www.canal-u.tv/auteurs/felker_michael
ROLE:author
NOTE:FELKER Michael, Durham, USA G. Michael Felker, MD, MHS, is an Associate Professor in the Division of Cardiology at Duke University Medical Center and the Director of Heart Failure Research at the Duke Clinical Research Institute. He did his medical training at Duke University School of Medicine, his internal medicine training at Johns Hopkins Hospital where he was chief resident, and his cardiology training at Duke. Dr. Felker has published over 120 peer reviewed articles and book chapters in the field of heart failure. He has served on the Steering Committee for multiple national and international clinical trials in heart failure. He Directs the Advanced Heart Failure Fellowship Training Program at the Duke University School of Medicine. Dr Felker is an editorial board member or peer reviewer for multiple high impact medical journals, including the New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, Lancet, Circulation, and JACC. He is the Associate Editor of JACC: Heart Failure and co-editor of Heart Failure: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease textbook. His research focus in on clinical trials (including clinical trials methodology) in acute and chronic heart failure, and the use of biomarkers as diagnostics, prognostic, and therapeutic tools in heart failure. 
TZ:+0200
END:VCARD
]]></entity>
<date><dateTime>2012-12-01</dateTime></date>
</contribute>
</lifeCycle>
<metaMetadata>
<metadataSchema>LOMv1.0</metadataSchema>
<metadataSchema>LOMFRv1.0</metadataSchema>
</metaMetadata>
<technical>
<format>video/mp4</format>
<location><![CDATA[https://www.canal-u.tv/video/canal_u_medecine/cardiovascular_clinical_trialists_cvct_forum_paris_2012_biomarker_guided_therapy_are_there_other_endpoints_besides_mortality_that_matter_selecting_the_best_outcome_measures.10915]]></location>
<location><![CDATA[https://streaming-canal-u.fmsh.fr/vod/media/canalu/videos/cutms/cardiovascular.clinical.trialists.cvct.forum.a.paris.2012.biomarker.guided.therapy.are.there.other.endpoints.besides.mortality.that.matter.selecting.the.best.outcome.measures_10915/2.23.cvct2012_felker_sd.mp4]]></location>
<location><![CDATA[https://streaming-canal-u.fmsh.fr/vod/media/canalu/videos/cutms/cardiovascular.clinical.trialists.cvct.forum.a.paris.2012.biomarker.guided.therapy.are.there.other.endpoints.besides.mortality.that.matter.selecting.the.best.outcome.measures_10915/2.23.cvct2012_felker_bd.mp4]]></location>
<size>89192756</size>
<duration><duration>PT0H17M30S</duration></duration>
</technical>
<educational>
<learningResourceType>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>lecture</value>
</learningResourceType>
<context>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>higher education</value>
</context>
<context>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>formation continue</value>
</context>
</educational>
<rights>
<cost>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>no</value>
</cost>
<copyrightAndOtherRestrictions>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>no</value>
</copyrightAndOtherRestrictions>
<description>
<string language="fre"><![CDATA[Droits réservés à l'éditeur et aux auteurs. 
]]></string>
</description>
</rights>
<relation>
<kind>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>ispartof</value>
</kind>
<resource>
<identifier>
<catalog>URI</catalog>
<entry>https://www.canal-u.tv/producteurs/canal_u_medecine/cardiologie/colloque_et_evenement/cvct</entry>
</identifier>
<description>
<string language="fre"><![CDATA[CVCT 9th Global Cardiovascular Clinical Trialists Forum • Paris 2012]]></string>
</description>
</resource>
</relation>
<classification>
<purpose>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>discipline</value>
</purpose>
<taxonPath>
<source>
<string language="fre"><![CDATA[Universités Numériques Thématiques 2009 http://www.universites-numeriques.fr]]></string>
</source>
<taxon>
<id/>
<entry>
<string language="fre"/>
</entry>
</taxon>
</taxonPath>
</classification>
<classification>
<purpose>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>discipline</value>
</purpose>
<taxonPath>
<source>
<string language="fre">CDD 22e éd.</string>
<string language="eng">DDC 22nd ed.</string>
</source>
<taxon>
<id>610</id>
<entry>
<string language="fre"><![CDATA[Sciences médicales. Médecine]]></string>
</entry>
</taxon>
</taxonPath>
</classification> </lom>