<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><lom xmlns="http://ltsc.ieee.org/xsd/LOM" xmlns:lomfr="http://www.lom-fr.fr/xsd/LOMFR" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://ltsc.ieee.org/xsd/LOM http://www.lom-fr.fr/xsd/lomfrv1.0/std/lomfr.xsd">
<general>
<identifier>
<catalog>Canal-U_Ocms</catalog>
<entry>63479</entry>
</identifier>
<title><string language="fre"><![CDATA[Nicolas Tournadre (AMU, Institut Universitaire de France, LACITO), "The Status of Egophoric Markers within the Tibetic Evidential-Epistemic Systems"]]></string></title>
<language>ENG</language>
<description>
<string language="fre"><![CDATA[After having discussed some definitions of
evidentiality and epistemic modality, I will concentrate upon the main
characteristics of the Tibetic Evidential-Epistemic systems, which are among
the most complex E-E systems attested in the World. The central notion of
access to information will be discussed in detail. I will then address the category
of egophoric, its status and its relationship with sensory markers (sensory and
endopathic) in Common Tibetan, as well as some typological features of
egophoric markers in other Tibetic languages.
 
References
Aikhenvald, A., Y. 2004. Evidentiality, New York
Oxford University Press, 2004.
Barnes, J. 1984 Evidential in the Tucuya verbs,
International Journal of American Linguistics. 50: 255-271
Faller, M. 2002. Remarks on evidential hierarchies. In
D. I. Beaver, L. D. C. Martinez, B. Z. Clark & S. Kaufmann (Eds.), The
construction of meaning (pp. 89-111). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Gawne, L. & Hill, N. (Eds.), 2017. Evidential
Systems of Tibetan Languages, De Gruyter Mouton.
Guentchéva, Z.,
L’énonciation médiatisée, 1996, Louvain-Paris, Peeters.
Guentchéva, Z., 2016. Aspectuality and Temporality,
Description and theoretical issues, John Benjamins Publishing Company,
Amsterdam, Philadelphia.
Tournadre, N., « Personne
et médiatif en tibétain », in La personne. Faits de langue, n°3, 1994, p. 149-158.*
Hill, N. 2021 review of Egophoricity. Simeon Floyd,
Elisabeth Norcliffe, and Lila San Roque, eds. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Publishing Company. Typological Studies in Language.118.
Karma Tshering & G. van Driem. 2019. The Grammar
of Dzongkha, Revised and Expanded, with a Guide to Roman Dzongkha and to
Phonological Dzongkha. Santa Barbara, California: Himalayan Linguistics
sKal-bzang ’Gyur-med (Kesang Gyurmé). 1992. Bod kyi
brda sprod rig pa’i khrid rgyun rab gsal me long: Le clair
miroir. Enseignement de la grammaire tibétaine. Traduit, adapté et commenté par
Heather Stoddard et Nicolas Tournadre. Arvillard: Éditions Prajñ?. [Second edition, 1994]
Oisel, G. 2017. ‘Re-evaluation of the evidential system of Lhasa
Tibetan and its atypical functions’, Himalayan Linguistics.
Mélac, E. 2014.
L'évidentialité en anglais - approche contrastive à partir d'un corpus anglais-tibétain,
PdD, Université Paris 3.
Simon, C. « La catégorie
égophorique dans les langues de l’Amdo (Tibet) » Société linguistique de Paris,
le 24 avril 2021.
Tournadre, Nicolas. 2008. Arguments against the
concept of ‘conjunct/disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart
and Paul Widmer (hrgb.) Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek : Festschrift für
Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, 281- 308. Halle:
Wissenschaftsverlag.
Tournadre, N., 2004 «
Typologie des aspects verbaux et intégration à une théorie du TAM », In
Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, vol.99, n°1,, p.7-68.
Tournadre, N. 2014b. Le
prisme des langues, essai sur la diversité linguistique et les difficultés des
langues, préface Claude Hagège. Paris
: L'Asiathèque.
Tournadre N. & LaPolla, R. 2014 « Towards a new
approach to evidentiality, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area» vol. 37:2,
2014, pp. 240–263
Tournadre, Nicolas. 2016. The future tenses in the
Tibetic languages. In Zlatka Guentcheva (ed) Aspectuality and Temporality:
Descriptive and theoretical issues, 1-24. (Studies in Language Companion series
172). Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
Tournadre, N. 2014. The Tibetic languages and their
classification. In Th. Owen-Smith & N. W. Hill (eds.) Trans-Himalayan
Linguistics: Historical and Descriptive Linguistics of the Himalayan Area,
105-129. Walter de Gruyter.
Tournadre N. 2017 “A typological sketch of evidential
/epistemic categories in the Tibetic languages”. In Gawne, L., & Hill, N.,
(Eds.), Evidential Systems of Tibetan Languages, De Gruyter Mouton.
Tournadre, N. and H. Suzuki. 2021. The Tibetic Languages: An Introduction to the
Family of Languages Derived from Old Tibetan (with the collaboration of Xavier
Becker and Alain Brucelles for the cartography). Linguistic diversity series,
Lacito, CNRS. Preface: R. LaPolla.
Tournadre, Nicolas &
Sangda Dorje. 2003. Manual of
Standard Tibetan. Ithaca: Snow Lion (with two CDs and maps of Tibet).
Tournadre, Nicolas & Mingyuan Shao. forthcoming.
Intentionality, evidentiality and epistemicity in Amdo Tibetan.
Vokurkova, Z. 2017. Epistemic Modality in Standard
Spoken Tibetan. Epistemic Verbal Endings and Copulas. Karolinum Press.
Yliniemi, Juha 2019. A descriptive grammar of
Denjongke (Sikkimese Bhutia), PhD. University of Helsinki
Zeisler, B. 2017. The emergence of the Ladakhi
inferential and experiential markers from a marker of admirativity
(non-commitment): the case of hdug and snang, Jsall. De Gruyter Mouton.
Zeisler, B. 2018. Don’t believe in a paradigm that you
haven’t manipulated yourself! – Evidentiality, speaker attitude, and
admirativity in Ladakhi. Himalayan Linguistics.
Zemp, M. A. 2018. A Grammar of Purik Tibetan. Series:
Brill’s Tibetan Studies Library, vol. 21. Languages of the Greater Himalayan
Region]]></string></description>
<keyword><string language="fre"><![CDATA[evidentiality]]></string></keyword><keyword><string language="fre"><![CDATA[epistemic modality]]></string></keyword><keyword><string language="fre"><![CDATA[egophoricity]]></string></keyword>
<lomfr:documentType>
<lomfr:source>LOMFRv1.0</lomfr:source>
<lomfr:value>image en mouvement</lomfr:value>
</lomfr:documentType>
</general><lifeCycle>
<contribute>
<role>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>author</value>
</role> 
<date><dateTime>2021-06-11</dateTime></date>
</contribute>
</lifeCycle>
<metaMetadata>
<metadataSchema>LOMv1.0</metadataSchema>
<metadataSchema>LOMFRv1.0</metadataSchema>
</metaMetadata>
<technical>
<format>video/mp4</format>
<location><![CDATA[https://www.canal-u.tv/video/emma/nicolas_tournadre_amu_institut_universitaire_de_france_lacito_the_status_of_egophoric_markers_within_the_tibetic_evidential_epistemic_systems.63479]]></location>
<location><![CDATA[https://streaming-canal-u.fmsh.fr/vod/media/canalu/videos/emma/nicolas.tournadre.amu.institut.universitaire.de.france.lacito.the.status.of.egophoric.markers.within.the.tibetic.evidential.epistemic.systems._63479/63479.sd.mp4]]></location>
<location><![CDATA[https://streaming-canal-u.fmsh.fr/vod/media/canalu/videos/emma/nicolas.tournadre.amu.institut.universitaire.de.france.lacito.the.status.of.egophoric.markers.within.the.tibetic.evidential.epistemic.systems._63479/63479.bd.mp4]]></location>
<size>201391164</size>
<duration><duration>PT0H58M15S</duration></duration>
</technical>
<educational>
<learningResourceType>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>lecture</value>
</learningResourceType>
<context>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>higher education</value>
</context>
<context>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>licence</value>
</context>
<context>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>master</value>
</context>
<context>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>doctorat</value>
</context>
<context>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>master</value>
</context>
</educational>
<rights>
<cost>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>no</value>
</cost>
<copyrightAndOtherRestrictions>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>no</value>
</copyrightAndOtherRestrictions>
<description>
<string language="fre"><![CDATA[Droits réservés à l'éditeur et aux auteurs. 
Tous droits réservés.]]></string>
</description>
</rights>
<relation>
<kind>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>ispartof</value>
</kind>
<resource>
<identifier>
<catalog>URI</catalog>
<entry>https://www.canal-u.tv/producteurs/emma/colloques/evidentiality_and_modality_at_the_crossroads_of_grammar_and_lexicon</entry>
</identifier>
<description>
<string language="fre"><![CDATA[Evidentiality And Modality: At The Crossroads Of Grammar And Lexicon]]></string>
</description>
</resource>
</relation>
<classification>
<purpose>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>discipline</value>
</purpose>
<taxonPath>
<source>
<string language="fre"><![CDATA[Universités Numériques Thématiques 2009 http://www.universites-numeriques.fr]]></string>
</source>
<taxon>
<id/>
<entry>
<string language="fre"/>
</entry>
</taxon>
</taxonPath>
</classification>
<classification>
<purpose>
<source>LOMv1.0</source>
<value>discipline</value>
</purpose>
<taxonPath>
<source>
<string language="fre">CDD 22e éd.</string>
<string language="eng">DDC 22nd ed.</string>
</source>
<taxon>
<id>410</id>
<entry>
<string language="fre"><![CDATA[Linguistique]]></string>
</entry>
</taxon>
</taxonPath>
<taxonPath>
<source>
<string language="fre">CDD 22e éd.</string>
<string language="eng">DDC 22nd ed.</string>
</source>
<taxon>
<id>401.41</id>
<entry>
<string language="fre"><![CDATA[Analyse du discours (langage, linguistique, la littérature et les langues)]]></string>
</entry>
</taxon>
</taxonPath>
</classification> </lom>