Ressource pédagogique : Nicolas Tournadre (AMU, Institut Universitaire de France, LACITO), "The Status of Egophoric Markers within the Tibetic Evidential-Epistemic Systems"

Informations pratiques sur cette ressource

Description de la ressource pédagogique

Description (résumé)

After having discussed some definitions of evidentiality and epistemic modality, I will concentrate upon the main characteristics of the Tibetic Evidential-Epistemic systems, which are among the most complex E-E systems attested in the World. The central notion of access to information will be discussed in detail. I will then address the category of egophoric, its status and its relationship with sensory markers (sensory and endopathic) in Common Tibetan, as well as some typological features of egophoric markers in other Tibetic languages.   References Aikhenvald, A., Y. 2004. Evidentiality, New York Oxford University Press, 2004. Barnes, J. 1984 Evidential in the Tucuya verbs, International Journal of American Linguistics. 50: 255-271 Faller, M. 2002. Remarks on evidential hierarchies. In D. I. Beaver, L. D. C. Martinez, B. Z. Clark & S. Kaufmann (Eds.), The construction of meaning (pp. 89-111). Stanford: CSLI Publications. Gawne, L. & Hill, N. (Eds.), 2017. Evidential Systems of Tibetan Languages, De Gruyter Mouton. Guentchéva, Z., L’énonciation médiatisée, 1996, Louvain-Paris, Peeters. Guentchéva, Z., 2016. Aspectuality and Temporality, Description and theoretical issues, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Philadelphia. Tournadre, N., « Personne et médiatif en tibétain », in La personne. Faits de langue, n°3, 1994, p. 149-158.* Hill, N. 2021 review of Egophoricity. Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe, and Lila San Roque, eds. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Typological Studies in Language.118. Karma Tshering & G. van Driem. 2019. The Grammar of Dzongkha, Revised and Expanded, with a Guide to Roman Dzongkha and to Phonological Dzongkha. Santa Barbara, California: Himalayan Linguistics sKal-bzang ’Gyur-med (Kesang Gyurmé). 1992. Bod kyi brda sprod rig pa’i khrid rgyun rab gsal me long: Le clair miroir. Enseignement de la grammaire tibétaine. Traduit, adapté et commenté par Heather Stoddard et Nicolas Tournadre. Arvillard: Éditions Prajñ?. [Second edition, 1994] Oisel, G. 2017. ‘Re-evaluation of the evidential system of Lhasa Tibetan and its atypical functions’, Himalayan Linguistics. Mélac, E. 2014. L'évidentialité en anglais - approche contrastive à partir d'un corpus anglais-tibétain, PdD, Université Paris 3. Simon, C. « La catégorie égophorique dans les langues de l’Amdo (Tibet) » Société linguistique de Paris, le 24 avril 2021. Tournadre, Nicolas. 2008. Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct/disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart and Paul Widmer (hrgb.) Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek : Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, 281- 308. Halle: Wissenschaftsverlag. Tournadre, N., 2004 « Typologie des aspects verbaux et intégration à une théorie du TAM », In Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, vol.99, n°1,, p.7-68. Tournadre, N. 2014b. Le prisme des langues, essai sur la diversité linguistique et les difficultés des langues, préface Claude Hagège. Paris : L'Asiathèque. Tournadre N. & LaPolla, R. 2014 « Towards a new approach to evidentiality, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area» vol. 37:2, 2014, pp. 240–263 Tournadre, Nicolas. 2016. The future tenses in the Tibetic languages. In Zlatka Guentcheva (ed) Aspectuality and Temporality: Descriptive and theoretical issues, 1-24. (Studies in Language Companion series 172). Amsterdam : John Benjamins. Tournadre, N. 2014. The Tibetic languages and their classification. In Th. Owen-Smith & N. W. Hill (eds.) Trans-Himalayan Linguistics: Historical and Descriptive Linguistics of the Himalayan Area, 105-129. Walter de Gruyter. Tournadre N. 2017 “A typological sketch of evidential /epistemic categories in the Tibetic languages”. In Gawne, L., & Hill, N., (Eds.), Evidential Systems of Tibetan Languages, De Gruyter Mouton. Tournadre, N. and H. Suzuki. 2021. The Tibetic Languages: An Introduction to the Family of Languages Derived from Old Tibetan (with the collaboration of Xavier Becker and Alain Brucelles for the cartography). Linguistic diversity series, Lacito, CNRS. Preface: R. LaPolla. Tournadre, Nicolas & Sangda Dorje. 2003. Manual of Standard Tibetan. Ithaca: Snow Lion (with two CDs and maps of Tibet). Tournadre, Nicolas & Mingyuan Shao. forthcoming. Intentionality, evidentiality and epistemicity in Amdo Tibetan. Vokurkova, Z. 2017. Epistemic Modality in Standard Spoken Tibetan. Epistemic Verbal Endings and Copulas. Karolinum Press. Yliniemi, Juha 2019. A descriptive grammar of Denjongke (Sikkimese Bhutia), PhD. University of Helsinki Zeisler, B. 2017. The emergence of the Ladakhi inferential and experiential markers from a marker of admirativity (non-commitment): the case of hdug and snang, Jsall. De Gruyter Mouton. Zeisler, B. 2018. Don’t believe in a paradigm that you haven’t manipulated yourself! – Evidentiality, speaker attitude, and admirativity in Ladakhi. Himalayan Linguistics. Zemp, M. A. 2018. A Grammar of Purik Tibetan. Series: Brill’s Tibetan Studies Library, vol. 21. Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region

"Domaine(s)" et indice(s) Dewey

• Linguistique (410)
• Analyse du discours (langage, linguistique, la littérature et les langues) (401.41)

Thème(s)